Newly added product or support has been enhanced: Enhanced recognition memory size (Windows Vista and above)ĭriver date/version information has been added or updated: So, I'm not really sure what the issue there is.Newly added or support has been enhanced: Also, after all three were rebuilt - all showed as connected and gateways up. So, the rules themselves are not failing. However, if I modified any of those rules to instead direct traffic out #3 they would work. When all three were built out any rules that would direct traffic through #1 and #2 would obviously fail. I can test this as I have rules that direct certain traffic through each of these VPNs. Continuing, I would rebuild #3 and #3 would work, but #1 and #2 would not work. I would then rebuild #2 and #2 would work, but #1 would fail. The issue wasn't that they didn't function after I rebuilt them. To the original issue I had - as I stated - after upgrading I did rebuild my VPN clients. Once I can get some answers to the outstanding questions I have from Netgate then I can make a better informed decision on the direction I'm going to go, however CE will not be it. The problem is those are simply things I've read that are hearsay and not direct from Netgate. I've been told they would allow for a "one time courtesy" transfer or if there is hardware failure. They still haven't addressed white box users and the transferability of a TAC Lite license. That said, I have no issue paying for a Plus license - however Netgate has continued to be poor at giving all the information (as if they are making decisions on the fly - which in my opinion is pretty bad). I love the product and trust the product, but I can't say that I trust the leadership decisions. My decision will only be pfSense+ or something non-pfSense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |